Editorial policy
The rules every article on BoostMyTin321 is written under. If a piece breaks one of them, that is a mistake and worth reporting.
Topics come from real questions
A piece gets written when people are searching for it and the existing answers are either thin or selling something. Nothing here exists to fill a content calendar.
Claims are written backwards, from the source
A sentence goes in only once the paper behind it has been read. If a figure cannot be traced to a study, it does not appear, however useful it would be to the argument.
Study size and quality are stated
Ten men in a laboratory is not the same as a meta-analysis of trials. Every article says which kind of evidence it is resting on, because that is the difference between a lead and a conclusion.
Null results are published too
The supplement trials that found nothing are covered with the same space as the ones that found something. That is the part most sites quietly skip.
No medical advice, no dosing
Nothing here diagnoses, prescribes or tells you how much of anything to take. Articles explain what research found and point you at a clinician for the personal decision.
Corrections are dated and visible
If a piece gets something wrong, it is fixed and the change is noted with the date. An honest site is not one that never makes mistakes; it is one that says when it does.
Money and the verdict
Affiliate income and advertising are kept away from editorial decisions. A product is not reviewed unless someone has used it, a commission rate never changes a score, and a brand cannot pay for a placement. Where a link earns a commission it is marked as sponsored and the disclosure sits on the page, not buried in a footer. Read the full disclosure.
Questions about this policy? Get in touch.